Call me Coco... Everybody does

This movie was extremely confusing because although I was warned that the story wasn't linear there was no clue from the film until more than halfway through. I kept waiting for the final scene that would nicely wrap up the whole movie and was, sadly, left wanting. I enjoyed the story more once the readings cleared up the time line for me... dreams are really confusing even when a master story teller is the one explaining. I think I felt more inclined toward Diane/Betty because I have dreams that are crazy and sometimes seem better than real life and whenever I wake up I always feel disoriented and wanting more than I have. Thankfully I have never tried to kill myself when I woke up. 

The entire movie had sexual overtones and tension between Betty and Rita... well I guess that was explained at the end. I felt justified about thinking Betty was hitting on Rita at the end of the movie. When I first started noticing the sexual tension my reaction was SERIOUSLY how pathetic to put in lesbian overtones, especially ones so blatantly obvious. What I want to know is if the story could have gone the same way if instead of two women it was a man and a woman. 

And what about the characters playing two characters? Like Camilla and the blond at the dinner party? Was this a knock on the hollywood narcissistic  attitude? Love yourself first others second?

Other than the inconclusive ending I really enjoyed this movie despite my misgivings on the blatant use of sexual overtones

Do you think I'm Sexy

I've seen this movie in another class and what upset me was that we didn't really discuss the influence of images in the film. So it was really helpful when we did discuss them in this class. I'm thinking the images were to show the violent nature of sex. which just shores up the ideas of the movie. After all, the violence done by both Mickey and Mallory ends with some sort of sexual encounter, even Scagnetti's sexual encounter is mixed with violence. 

I really enjoyed this movie, more so this second time because i didn't have to focus on the story as much so I was able to look at the images...seeing the images of Mickey as the demon was a little freaky since he was covered in blood and looked like he was about to rip off the head of the next person to look at him (I know that was the point...the demon inside of each of us wants to kill)

I was happy Jess brought up the fact that at the end when they were showing the media around all the "star" murderers they were playing circus music, it made me think that we as a society make these people famous, it isn't who they kill or how they do it, or even how many they kill. Let the media get their teeth into a story and you have an over night sensation and everyone is talking about them. 

In the Freak Shows people were put on display and then stories were made up about them mostly not true but the story is what drew people in...cheap thrills. 

I think my favorite part of the movie is when someone pleads to be kept alive ('you always leave someone alive to tell the story') and of course no one ever is because either there is only one person to kill anyway or there is a camera.

the idea of being killed frightens the individual yet thrills the crowd.

I need to see this movie a couple more times before I think I will really understand all of it.

The more you drive the less intelligent you are

4 dead aliens and a press conference. Did anyone else feel that the Leila thought nothing about bringing aliens to a press conference. And since when do dead aliens have the ability to vaporize people? I love that the one repo man told Otto to buckle up, safety first and then they are put in situations where they are being shot at. It seemed that all of the people working with Otto were philosophizing, but they all had vastly different ideas: UFOs as Time Machines vs the Repo Code vs Mind Over Matter. 

 At one point Miller says "You get stuck up on specifics you miss out on the whole thing." I think that is part of the point of pastiche, mash up all the genres and make the whole movie about visuals. With the mash up of genres you need to really pay attention to understand the movie, but by paying attention to the overall storyline you miss out on some of the more subtle parts of the movie and their meanings/impact.

ie: What's with the one brother wearing a hair net? is it a subtle reminder of the menial drudgery of a short order cook vs the crazy life of a repo man? And what about the security guard knitting...can't even start to figure that one out. Or all of the Smiley Face buttons?

This movie reminded me of several other movies such as 

Mother, Jugs and Speed

Super Troopers

Ghostbusters

and a tiny bit of Back to the Future

and the Steven King book From a Buick 8 (horrible book by the way)

I really enjoyed this movie and its sometimes blatant mocking of the genres

Wanna Buy a Duck?

Have you ever played the game Wanna Buy A Duck? If you have you know that is is a mindless game that provides entertainment to easily amused people. (I count myself as one of the easily amused) Petey Wheatstraw reminded me of that game at first... seriously a full grown boy and a watermelon? But as I watched I saw that the Blaxploitation was proving useful. For example when Petey Wheatstraw kicked the butts of those car thieves, yeah its overly theatrical, but when he gets back to his car he makes a point to speaking to the community about how it is their job to make sure that these guys don't strike again, they need to have pride in themselves before others will respect them. The over the top acting and theatrics make it entertaining while the message of self improvement  gets worked in. When the younger brother speaks about skipping school, the older brother sets him on the right path, getting to school will make the future brighter, I felt it was a little corny because I have heard school friendly phrases all my life, but the truth is that when this film was made the idea of constant education and then further education after grammar school probably wasn't one held by most families.

I can't wait to see the rest of the film and how Petey reacts to the Devil's bargain.

Nobody is Innocent

During the preface for High Plains Drifter McRae said that the hero was an anti hero and that the towns people were innocent. I am hoping that I heard wrong because from what I saw not a single person in the entire film was innocent. I guess that is the point of the film tho, nobody is perfect but you take what you have and make the best out of what you have. In this case our stranger took advantage of the fear the townspeople had and used it for vengeance. I don't think the Stranger was a bad person, he was just driven by a terrible event.

The entire film reminded me of the movie Boondock Saints, at the very beginning when Conner and Murphy are at church and the priest's sermon speaks of Kitty Genovese and the indifference of good men.

If the Stranger was a bad man I think I would have felt some remorse about what he did to the towns people, but I didn't. I felt it was an ingenious form of pay back.

The only part that was hard to swallow was when he took the woman into the barn and had his way with her, yet even that was softened by the way she started clinging to him before it was over. She was more upset that he didn't buy her dinner first than anything. When she bumped into and and tried to make him feel the fool, she was just trying to get him to notice her so that they could spend a little time in the sack together and perhaps she could get a few pretty baubles along with a good time. 

Play some solitaire to pass the time

What was with the women in this film (except for Angela Lansbury) love is a split second of seeing someone and of course that other someone must love them back. Eugenie Rose broke off her engagement the day she met Ben...come on!!!!!

Aside from those women I loved this movie. My favorite part was when Senator Iselin wanted just one number of how many communists were KNOWN to be in the defense department and Lansbury picks 57 off the Ketchup  bottle.

I bet Dr. Freud would have a field day with this movie...Mommy as the puppet master. Raymond hates his mother and stepfather. I feel like there is a little bit of Hamlet in this movie. 

Does hypnotism really work like that? Can Ben really break the hold the over Raymond by showing him 52 red queens? I want to know why Raymond focuses the gun on the Presidential Candidate instead of his mother if he was going to kill mom and dad, is it to show the uncertainty of loyalties and the fear that no matter how hard you try you cannot break a governments control over the minds of its victims?

The fear of communism is played off like a joke...how many known communists Senator Iselin? The real fear of communism isn't there, the fact that being accused of communism would ruin your life and that of everyone you know isn't there. 

Touch of Racism

I'm not really sure how to feel about this movie.

 The bad guys are not completely bad guys, Uncle Grandi for instance, we feel bad for him when he is murdered. We start off being made to dislike him but throughout the film we see him show concern for the people under his care. When Susan Vargas is drugged at the hotel he makes sure his females have not done any drugs...he's all paternal. 

The tension builds throughout the whole movie...is someone going to be unfairly convicted? Is someone going to be raped? The tension builds so slowly I'm surprised the movie wasn't longer. The idea of the movie was good but the over all effect kind of left me wanting something more. I'm not sure if that is because I've seen movies like Crash where the problem of prejudice is so very open.

The border town reminded me of the town in Stagecoach with hookers and lawlessness.